All
you need in this life is ignorance and confidence, and then success
is sure. Mark Twain.
Back in the days of industrial trail breaking in the West
Kootenays, I had a good ski buddy who loved to break trail the way a
Collie likes herding sheep. In other words, it was bred into him
with strong legs, a big heart (in both a physical and spiritual
sense) and a boundless work capacity. The only two things that held
him back from the ranks of god-like trail breakers was a tendency to
get geographically misplaced and a propensity to miss rather obvious
terrain management cues. This meant he could break trail for hours
at a time and build fabulous gradually ascending trails that even the
most infirm in the group could follow but they might be up the guts
of an avalanche gully with a looming cornice overhead and the entire
group stacked up so that an avalanche would take everyone out all at
the same time.
My strategy for managing this, because everyone hates a nag even
if they pretend to be OK with you blowing the whistle for the 45th
time on a three hour sea kayak tour, was to ignore any and all crazy
foibles unless there was identifiable risk. Not imaginary discomfort
from your “lived experience” but actual risk to the ski party,
such as ascending steep convex terrain when shallow angle terrain was
available, or going 180 degrees in the wrong direction (sometimes
both at the same time).
This remains where I fall on the continuum of legitimate
criticisms on shared trips. If I’ve made poor decisions such that
I have endangered people, you should definitely raise the issue with
me. We may not reach agreement, as people often choose a risky
option over a safe one because we value outcomes and experience
differently. But, if my decision is based on some kind of
hare-brained over-confidence and encompasses a paternalistic (or
maternalistic) “I will take responsibility for X,” attitude –
especially where X is too inexperienced or inept to make a rational
judgement and is simply trusting me (or you) blindly – those
decisions are absolutely fair game for an open and reasoned discussion (or debrief, as the terminology runs). If I am angry
about this, I am a delusional fool and you are right to mistrust me
until I prove otherwise.
This system can work, although it may be uncomfortable to confront
your own errors of judgement or lack of skill. What doesn’t work
is pretending to forget (even if you do forgive) dozens of trips
where poor judgement had real consequences. Medical emergencies
aside, if you need professional rescue multiple times in your outdoor
adventure career, you have a judgement problem. It was Mark Twain,
the famous satirist and novelist, who wrote “Good judgement is the
result of experience and experience is the result of bad judgement.”
Twain, of course, wrote from his own experience of declaring
bankruptcy in 1894 after a series of bad investments. By 1898
however, Twain through hard work, help from friends and associates,
and not making the same mistakes multiple times, had paid his debts
off and amassed a significant estate. Twain died a wealthy man. If
the “first casualty of war is truth,” trust is the first thing
lost when arrogance and hubris prevents accurate assessments of
decision errors.