Of
course we live in the age of pop psychology where everyone has a
diagnosed mental health condition (from stigma to social necessity)
and anything even minimally upsetting is described as a
“micro-aggression” or a sign of “ageism, sexism, ableism,”
add your own ism ad nauseum (nausism?). The ABC (that bastion of
unbiased reporting) recently published an entire article on how to commit “Small acts of resistance known as
"micro-feminism" [which] can help women feel empowered at
work.” These micro-feminist acts include addressing females first
in e-mails and holding the door open for men (this must be tough for
some feminists who are unable to distinguish men from women). Now,
I’ve been known to do both of these things from time to time,
simply because being a polite and reasonable person frequently
involves holding the door for someone following you regardless of
sex, and who, but an obsessed ideologue, really notices the gender
order of emails? Does anyone? And if you do, for the love of god,
get a more interesting life.

Not that long ago a friend told me that the doctor who recommended
her 80 plus year old mother (I’m not sure of her exact age but
suffice to say that mum is by all metrics old) might consider getting
a walker after her mother fell over and could not get up was
exhibiting ageism and, as such, insulting her mother, and, probably,
also committing several other micro-aggressions. Now I might argue,
and so might the statistics, that hip fractures, primarily if not
entirely caused by falls in the elderly, significantly increase
morbidity and mortality. An Australian series, in line with data from other countries, indicate that 26%
of old people who experience a hip fracture are dead within one year.
In this context, a doctor who does NOT recommend a walking aid might
be considered either uncaring or incompetent, or possibly both.
Biology, it turns out, doesn’t care about your isms. Old people
and broken bones are not good matches.
The big latest thing is narcissism. Increasing everywhere we are
told, and, although I dislike and disdain overwrought over-emotional
headlines, it’s likely true that society is getting more
narcissistic. I’m pretty sure that I had a narcissist as a friend for a long time. The friendship was a bit of a
roller coaster and I was always left feeling vaguely both disquieted
and down-trodden after any interaction. Despite this we remained
friends for many years and did lots of trips together, until, one day
it all fell apart over unreasonable demands. I actually tried to
patch the friendship up; generally I believe it’s hard to have too
many good friends, but, the patch up fell apart as well because, as
one would expect with a narcissist, everything was my fault and
nothing really happened the way it did. There is a certain point you
reach in interactions with narcissists when the mask irrevocably
falls off and the face behind is anything but pretty.

The most quoted (almost revered) book on narcissism is Christopher
Lasch’s book The Culture of Narcissism. I found this a tough read. Written in
1979, it’s more a long and rambling essay, with strikingly few
sentence and paragraph breaks, than a book of chapters where each
chapter builds on the last. I also struggled part way through (it’s
rare for me to NOT finish a book) Anne Manne’s The Life of I: The New Culture of Narcissism. I found Manne’s book
too graphically violent and disturbing for bed-time reading and never
finished it. The cases she reviewed (coincidentally all or almost
all men, perhaps not surprising from an Australian author) seemed to
portray people who were more evil than narcissistic. After all, most
of us will encounter someone who seems a bit narcissistic in our
journey through life but few of us encounter serial rapists and
killers. True narcissism is apparently quite rare.
Currently, I’m reading Twenge and Campbell’s book, The Narcissism Epidemic. Twenge,
of course, is now well known for her series of books on cultural
changes and you might even, cynically, think that her career is built
on narcissism (at least research on narcissism). Twenge appears to
describe a cultural narcissism probably better described as
self-obsession than narcissistic personality disorder which appears to be both rare and dangerous.
We do seem, however, to gravitate towards narcissists, or at least
some of us do. I don’t think I’m one of the “some of us”
because I am so damned cynical and sceptical, but I could be
narcissistic for thinking I’m different. It’s likely true that
most narcissists don’t think there is anything wrong with them.
Narcissism among the upper classes seems to take the form “see this
amazing thing I did for no benefit to myself but all the benefit to
others.” Although, when you break the thing down, the doer seems
to benefit an awful lot and others, not so much. I always think this
when I see prominent political commentators on their favourite
soap-box, education, for example. If you’ve been talking about
education for 20 years but have not once stepped into your local
public school and offered to help teach one child to read, you have
achieved far less than you could. Think of it, one day a week, for
20 years teaching one child to read and you would have taught over a
thousand people to read. That’s doing the hard yards though,
posting on Bluesky is so much easier,
plus, you never have to leave the house!
Here’s a great article by Mark Twight about the latest in Everest climbing which is where the worlds faux-climbers go to
live out their narcissistic dreams. It’s a shame that young climbers are so disconnected from the great history of alpinism
that they do not recognise even some of the best and boldest climbers
who ever lived. Perhaps it’s cultural narcissism; the inability to
grasp that people who are old now did things that were as hard if not
harder than anything today’s young climbers are punching out. It’s
a loss of history that only those who’ve been around long enough to
witness history made seem to appreciate.