I'm at the stage with my Stronglifts program where the weights go up, then down, then up, then down, and I
don't mean up and down like a bench press. After a few sessions,
I'll finally manage to squeak out 5 sets of 5 reps, which means next
session the weight goes up. When I first started out, it might take
one or two sessions to build back up to 5 sets of 5 reps, now it
takes three sessions, and some times I don't make it in three
sessions, which means the weight goes down again. The only exercise
where I am continuing to steadily add weight is my deadlift. On all
my other exercises I am cycling up and down to gain a few kilograms
overall.
Beautiful Century, Rocky Mountains, AB
Riding home from the gym today, I was
thinking about how fixated you get on a number that is essentially
fairly meaningless. I'm not sure that there is any really robust
scientific reason why 5 sets of 5 reps is the magic target number for
strength gains, but once that number is out there, my attention sure
gets glued on to it and it becomes to some degree the measure of
success or failure.
I know too many climbers who get
similarly attached to climbing grades, often to the point of
absurdity. They'll thrutch their way up a route in the poorest
possible style, dogging on all the gear, simply because the climb is
rated a certain number and, once climbed they can “tick off” that
grade. This is like completing your reps/sets with poor form, such
as not squatting deeply, and calling that level done. It ain't done
unless you did it clean and with good form.
Care Aid, Waterline Wall, Selkirks, BC
Years ago I belonged to women's
climbing club and I can remember the instructor teaching us about
working up through grade pyramids. Essentially, you start the bottom
of the pyramid at a grade about one level above what you can climb
easily, say a 10a (Ewebank 18) and you aim to redpoint three
different 10a climbs, then two different 10b climbs, then one 10c
climb. After that, you start the pyramid again with 10c on the
bottom. I thought the whole thing seemed quite obvious. Climbing
one 10a doesn't make you a 10a climber as there are a whole range of
10a routes out there in the real world. But, this concept was totally
lost on the rest of my team-mates all of whom were gym climbers (it's
an interesting aside to note that they all quit climbing after a year
or two) and the instructor really struggled to get this concept
across.
You see the same concept in all kinds
of recreational endeavours. People think if they nail an eskimo roll
they know all there is to know about kayaking, or if they can make
some parallel/tele turns they know all there is to know about ski
mountaineering, but there is so much more involved in traveling
safely and efficiently in the big, wide outside world than simply
mastering one fairly minor technical skill. A big part of becoming
more proficient is simply getting out as often as you can. My
kayaking has got better from more mileage in more varied conditions
not because I have simply been banging away at learning to eskimo
roll. There's a similar analogy to weight training, if you keep
working at it, your form continues to improve and, while there may
not be big gains on each end of the bar, you do get better at
recruiting all your muscles, stabilizing the trunk under load, and
moving through a full range of motion. Hitting a new PR on any
particular lift is nice, but a secondary achievement to simply
becoming a stronger more functional human being.