This
is probably the last post where I will talk about anything covid
related, which actually is a bit ironic because I’ve had something
to say about the management of covid since the mystery illness first
appeared. Of course, during the first two years, it was impossible
to question the dominant narrative of fear, death and Big Pharma.
Now that some (not all) of the censorship has been rolled back, and
we can finally speak about the ‘rona years, there’s so much to
say, and also so much fatigue about the whole issue that it’s quite
hard to write anything coherent that sums up two years of madness in
a page or two.
Canada's Chief Public Health Officer, who has advised to skip kissing, while insisting on wearing a mask during sexual activities in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19
In leiu of coherence, which I don’t have even in my own mind,
I’m going to put down a bunch of bullet points and leave the topic
forever. This does not mean I am in favour of a “covid amnesty.” Enormous mistakes were made and leaving those
mistakes unexamined means we will simply repeat them next time the
WHO (a conflicted if not outright captured agency) cries “virus”.
If you trace, historically, the public health/government response to
similar health scares, it’s obvious that as time passes, the
government response has become more and more extreme without a
consequent increase in public health. In fact, public health has
deteriorated markedly in the last 50 years. At this point, if you
are not questioning how public health functions, you probably need to
sit in the corner for a bit and do some serious thinking.
1. The Keskt CNC Insitute tracks public opinion on the ‘rona. In
July 2020, they surveyed European populations and found that the
general population overestimated both the spread of ‘rona (number
of infections) and the fatality rate due to ‘rona, by factors
ranging from 4 to 300 times greater than those numbers actually were.
Death rates across all European countries were overestimated by, at
a minimum 100 times and at a maximum 300 times. Fear porn works.
2. John Ionnaidis of Stanford University (pre-pandemic one of the
world’s pre-eminent epidemiologists – he was knocked off that peg
because he wanted science not hysteria to prevail) noted that the
average age of death due to ‘rona during the pandemic equaled the
average age of death pre-pandemic. All but the most bleary thinkers
should be able to understand
what that means.
3. Over half a million scientific papers have been published about ‘rona.
Almost all of those would be better used to paper the bottom of the
budgie cage than used to guide public policy. I’m almost, but not
quite (the budgie cage is my addition) quoting Ionnaidis. There has
been a deluge of extremely poor quality papers that show nothing at
all but are trotted out to suit whatever bias the purveyor of such
junk believes.
4. Medicine is not a bias free field. Huge financial incentives
govern what gets studied, what gets published and what makes it’s
way into the public space. Bizarrely, medicine, science, the public
all ignore the effect of incentives even though we all know that
incentives are one of the most effective ways to influence human
behavior.
5. Medical science is almost completely dominated by Big Pharma and
industry who fund not only the trials that get done but the
regulatory agencies. Regulatory agencies in the developed world are,
at this point, completely captured and dependent on Big Pharma for
funding. The staff rotate between staff positions on the various
regulatory boards and the boards of Big Pharma, the very industry
they are supposed to regulate. If you don’t believe this, you are
probably going to wander down to the back garden tonight to look for
leprechauns.
6. Big Pharma has an appalling history of corruption and malfeasance.
It’s hard to imagine that 2020 was the watershed year when all
that changed.
7. Absolute false-hoods – your Mum called them lies and gave you a
clip across the ear – are being told by both sides in the ‘rona
wars. Very often these are easily disproven, often in mere minutes.
This
has recently made the Twitter rounds. It’s not true, or at least
the statement is unable to be shown to be true because the five pages
that deal with masking in the report have been redacted. Don’t
believe me. I mean, really don’t believe. Check
for yourself. Always check for yourself.
8. Among the most egregiously poor studies are the modelling studies.
Unfortunately, we are still swamped with modelling studies. Many,
maybe even most claims about the prevalence of long covid are based
on modelling. Note that I am not saying long covid does not exist.
Long term symptoms/syndromes have been known historically to follow
many viral infections; there is every reason to believe that the
‘rona, like other viruses will result in long duration symptoms in
some individuals. Modelling, however, provides no information about
the true prevalence. Most of the modelling done to date has been
shit.
9. Marcia Angell, former Editor in Chief at the prestigious New
England Journal of Medicine wrote in 2009: "It is simply no
longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is
published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or
authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this
conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two
decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine."
Things have got worse.
10. There was massive collusion and censorship among the big tech companies (think
Metaverse, Google, Twitter), main stream media (MSM)
and the government to shut
down any dissenting voices during the height of the ‘rona crisis.
This included shutting down not only on theories that most of us
would deem a “bit out there” (like 5G chips being implanted) but
also the voices of highly respected scientists (for example, John
Ionnaidis) who called for caution when implementing highly
destructive policies to curb the spread of ‘rona. Jacinda
Arden is famously remembered for her chilling statement that “we will continue to be your one source of truth.” There is no truth in science, and
even if there was, it’s highly unlikely that the New Zealand
Government (or any government) is in possession of that truth.
Science is about testing, questioning and retesting. We are all the
poorer for two years of outrageous censorship. Adults have lost the
ability to think for themselves, people have been scared out of
proportion to the actual risk
(see points one and two above), and we’ve all lost any confidence
at all in public health and
government officials (admittedly,
I had little to start with).
I have been astonished at the things people have come to believe
during the ‘rona times, but also astonished by the echo chamber
people have deliberately decided to live in. One of the key
capacities which should separate adults from children is that we are
able to consider opposing ideas, sometimes, even hold two opposing
ideas at the one time, and most of life, deal with uncertainty. It
is comforting to rush into the proverbial arms of the Blue Check
covid-warriors who pronounce with utter certainty that “masks stop
the spread” (unlikely given what we know), or that Hepa works, long
covid is a pandemic itself, there are no vaccine injuries, lockdowns
are effective etc., etc. Conversely, not every sudden death is due
to the vaccine, no-one has been micro-chipped, mRNA vaccines are not
gene therapy, etc. etc.
If you are an adult, part of being an adult is taking a critical
look at the latest crazy idea to cross your field of vision. It is
tiring, always being on guard against misinformation and the legions
of vested interests whose goal is manipulation, mostly for profit,
sometimes for actual malfeasance. Consider this intellectual investment
akin to exercise done for the body, only it is exercise for the mind.